COMPLAINTS POLICY OF RIGHTSINFO - RightsInfo
  1. RightsInfo views complaints as an opportunity to learn and improve the quality of our journalism and the contents of our publication for the future, as well as a chance to put things right for the person (or organisation) that has made the complaint.
  2. Opinions may vary about RightsInfo’s output, but may not necessarily suggest a breach of standards. Our reply may not therefore be what someone might wish, but if we agree RightsInfo is at fault, we will take steps to address the complaint.
  3. Our policy is:

 

Definition of a Complaint  

4. A complaint is any expression of dissatisfaction, whether justified or not, about the editorial content, standards of journalism or conduct of employees or contributors involved in production of our publication(s) that engages the standards set out in the Code.  

Who Can Complain and How?

5. Complaints may come from any person or organisation who is:

6. A complaint should be received by email or in writing (see details below), although complaints are accepted by other reasonable means where it is not convenient or practical for the individual complainant to complain in writing.

7. A complaint should be clearly marked as such. General enquiries and requests for corrections will not normally be dealt with as a complaint under this policy unless the complainant makes it clear that they wish to make a complaint.

 

Whistleblowing Rights of Employees and Contributors

8. Employees or contributors are encouraged to contact the IMPRESS confidential whistleblowing hotline (“the Hotline”) if they are being pressurised to breach the standards set out in the Code or if they have concerns that the standards set out in the Code are not being adhered to more generally by Us.

9. We will publicise the contact details of the Hotline to all our employees and contributors.

10. Any employee or contributor of who uses the Hotline does so with Our full support and in the knowledge that they will not be sanctioned as a result of doing so,

11. We guarantee to protect all whistle-blowers from possible reprisals, victimisation or sanction if a disclosure has been made in good faith even if a subsequent independent investigation carried out by IMPRESS into our journalism finds there to be no breach of the Code or of the IMPRESS Regulatory Scheme. For the avoidance of doubt, We will not take any action to the detriment of anyone who uses the IMPRESS whistleblowing hotline or declines to breach the Standards Code adopted by Us as part of our compliance with the IMPRESS Regulatory Scheme.

 

Confidentiality

12. All complaint information will be handled sensitively, telling only those who need to know and following any relevant data protection requirements.

 

Compliance Records

13. We will maintain a written record of all complaints, to include the name and contact details of the complainant, the material or conduct in respect of which the complaint is made and the alleged Code breach.

14. For each complaint record, We will include any steps taken by Us to address the complaint, and the outcome of the complaint.  This record will be made available to IMPRESS and to the public (in a redacted form, where necessary), for publication by IMPRESS in its annual report.

15. We will report to IMPRESS all compliance failures of which We become aware (whether complained about or not)

16. Monitoring and learning from complaints are reviewed quarterly by Us to identify any trends which may indicate a need to take further action.

 

Responsibility

17. Overall responsibility for this policy and its implementation lies with our Board of Trustees, and the Senior Management team.

18. Responsibility for ensuring that complaints are managed in accordance with this policy lies with the Chief Executive.

19. If a complaint is received about our output by an individual working for RightsInfo, it should be forwarded to the News and Social Media Editor in the first instance. At no point should volunteers or freelancers deal with complaints.

20. The Senior Management team may, at any point, seek advice from the Trustee Board. If a complaint raises legal issues, or is deemed serious in some other way, the matter will be escalated to the Trustees.

 

Procedure

Stage One:  Making a Complaint

  1. Information on how to make a complaint is clearly publicised in the footer of our website.
  2. Complaints may be sent in writing to us at 7 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0PE, by e-mail at info@rightsinfo.org, or other reasonable means where this is more convenient and practical for the complainant. We will endeavour to acknowledge your complaint within 72 hours, and within 7 days at the latest, though there may be cases when this takes longer. If your complaint has been directed to an address other than info@rightsinfo.org or our postal address, it may take us longer to process.
  3. Complainants should provide the following information before their complaint will be considered:

4. The desired outcome or remedy sought by the complainant 4. We will make reasonable efforts to contact a complainant by telephone, e-mail or in writing to ensure that sufficient information is provided to respond to the complaint.

 

Stage Two – Recording, Investigating and Resolving the Complaint

5. The complaint information should be passed to the News and Social Media editor and Chief Executive, who are responsible for legal standards and compliance. They will record it in the complaints log and will acknowledge receipt of the complaint by e-mail or in writing within 7 calendar days of receipt of the complaint.

6. The acknowledgement of receipt of a complaint should say who is dealing with the complaint and when the person complaining can expect a reply. Any conflicts of interest should also be declared at this point. A copy of this complaints policy should be attached.

7. The Chief Executive is responsible for ensuring that the circumstances of the complaint are investigated fairly and that any conflicts of interest are managed. This may require the complainant to provide additional information, documents or other evidence to support their complaint.

8. The News & Social Media Editor and Chief Executive will then assessed the complaint against the IMPRESS Standards Code and consider a number of questions about the content in question, not limited to, but including:

9. The News & Social Media Editor and Chief Executive will make a decision on whether the complaint is justified or not. If the team believes there has been a breach of the IMPRESS Standards Code, we will offer an appropriate response as soon as is practicable. This may include, but is not limited to:

10. Complainants should receive a final decision within 21 calendar days from the date of the receipt of the complaint.

11. The final decision letter will inform complainants that they have the right to refer their complaint to IMPRESS, stating the applicable time limits, set out in clause 4.4 of the IMPRESS Regulatory Scheme, and how to contact IMPRESS.

12. Whether the complaint is justified or not, the reply to the complainant should describe the action taken to investigate the complaint, the conclusions from the investigation, and any action taken as a result of the complaint.


Stage Three – Escalating the Complaint to IMPRESS

  1. If the complainant feels that the problem has not been satisfactorily resolved by us at Stage Two or if the complainant feels that there are justifiable reasons why the complaint is so urgent that they cannot wait for us to respond, they can request that the complaint is reviewed by IMPRESS in accordance with its Regulatory Scheme, by contacting IMPRESS using the following details:

 

Help us increase understanding and support for human rights in the UK.

Donate